Welcome!

Eclipse Authors: Carmen Gonzalez, Roger Strukhoff, Lori MacVittie, Kevin Jackson, Mark R. Hinkle

News Feed Item

QLogic Reports Third Quarter Results for Fiscal Year 2014

QLogic Corp. (Nasdaq:QLGC), a leading supplier of high performance network infrastructure solutions, today announced its third quarter financial results for the period ended December 29, 2013.

Third Quarter Highlights

  • Net revenue: $119.4 million
  • GAAP income from continuing operations: $20.6 million or $0.24 per diluted share
  • Non-GAAP income from continuing operations: $25.6 million or $0.29 per diluted share
  • Operating margin: 17.0% GAAP, 23.1% non-GAAP
  • Cash and marketable securities: $462.4 million as of December 29, 2013
  • Cash generated from operations: $37.4 million

Financial Results

Net revenue of $119.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 was consistent with the net revenue reported in the same quarter last year. Revenue from Advanced Connectivity Platforms increased to $98.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 from $97.0 million in the same quarter last year. Revenue from Legacy Connectivity Products was $21.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to $22.4 million in the same quarter last year.

Income from continuing operations on a GAAP basis for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 increased to $20.6 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, from $13.7 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2013. Income from continuing operations on a non-GAAP basis for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 increased to $25.6 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, from $18.3 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2013.

“During the third quarter, we delivered strong financial results, including non-GAAP earnings per diluted share that exceeded our original guidance range,” said Jean Hu, interim chief executive officer, senior vice president and chief financial officer, QLogic. “We are very pleased with our continued focus and execution. As a result of our restructuring activities earlier in the year, we have continued our sharper focus on the server and storage connectivity markets and are now operating more effectively and efficiently as reflected in our financial results.”

QLogic uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to supplement financial statements based on GAAP. A summary of these non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as a description of the reasons that management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and the additional purposes for which management uses these non-GAAP financial measures, is presented in the accompanying financial schedules.

QLogic’s third quarter fiscal 2014 conference call is scheduled for today at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time). Jean Hu, interim chief executive officer, senior vice president and chief financial officer, will host the conference call. The call is being webcast live via the Internet at http://ir.qlogic.com and www.earnings.com. Phone access to participate in the conference call is available at (888) 318-7470, pass code: 2752790.

The financial information that the company intends to discuss during the conference call will be available on the company’s website at http://ir.qlogic.com for twelve months following the conference call. A replay of the conference call will be available via webcast at http://ir.qlogic.com for twelve months.

Follow QLogic @ twitter.com/qlogic

QLogic – the Ultimate in Performance

QLogic (Nasdaq:QLGC) is a global leader and technology innovator in high performance server and storage networking connectivity products. Leading OEMs and channel partners worldwide rely on QLogic for their server and storage networking solutions. For more information, visit www.qlogic.com.

Disclaimer – Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements relating to future results of the company (including certain beliefs and projections regarding business and market trends, as well as our belief that we have a sharper focus on the server and storage connectivity markets and that we are operating more effectively and efficiently) that are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements. The company advises readers that these potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: unfavorable economic conditions; potential fluctuations in operating results; gross margins that may vary over time; the stock price of the company may be volatile; the company's dependence on the networking markets served; the ability to maintain and gain market or industry acceptance of the company's products; the company's dependence on a small number of customers; the company's ability to compete effectively with other companies; the ability to attract and retain key personnel; the complexity of the company's products; declining average unit sales prices of comparable products; the company's dependence on sole source and limited source suppliers; the company's dependence on relationships with certain third-party subcontractors and contract manufacturers; sales fluctuations arising from customer transitions to new products; seasonal fluctuations and uneven sales patterns in orders from customers; a reduction in sales efforts by current distributors; changes in the company's tax provisions or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of its income tax returns; international economic, currency, regulatory, political and other risks; facilities of the company and its suppliers and customers are located in areas subject to natural disasters; the ability to protect proprietary rights; the ability to satisfactorily resolve any infringement claims; uncertain benefits from strategic business combinations, acquisitions and divestitures; declines in the market value of the company's marketable securities; changes in and compliance with regulations; difficulties in transitioning to smaller geometry process technologies; the use of "open source" software in the company's products; system security risks, data protection breaches and cyber-attacks; and the company’s ability to borrow under its credit agreement is subject to certain covenants.

More detailed information on these and additional factors that could affect the company's operating and financial results are described in the company's Forms 10-K, 10-Q and other reports filed, or to be filed, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company urges all interested parties to read these reports to gain a better understanding of the business and other risks that the company faces. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made only as of the date hereof, and the company does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

QLogic and the QLogic logo are registered trademarks of QLogic Corporation. Other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of the companies with which they are associated.

               

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited — in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

 
Net revenues $ 119,449 $ 119,386 $ 345,187 $ 367,624
Cost of revenues   38,446   39,089     111,378   121,382  
Gross profit   81,003   80,297     233,809   246,242  
 
Operating expenses:
Engineering and development 35,235 38,409 110,412 115,891
Sales and marketing 16,113 19,325 51,957 57,950
General and administrative 7,406 8,139 22,698 24,951
Special charges   1,947       18,329    
Total operating expenses   60,701   65,873     203,396   198,792  
 
Operating income 20,302 14,424 30,413 47,450
 
Interest and other income, net   970   903     1,768   2,935  
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 21,272 15,327 32,181 50,385
 
Income taxes   686   1,622     3,668   6,459  
 
Income from continuing operations 20,586 13,705 28,513 43,926
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes     (464 )     (425 )
 
Net income $ 20,586 $ 13,241   $ 28,513 $ 43,501  
 
Income from continuing operations per share:
Basic $ 0.24 $ 0.15 $ 0.32 $ 0.46
Diluted $ 0.24 $ 0.15 $ 0.32 $ 0.46
 
Loss from discontinued operations per share:
Basic $ $ (0.01 ) $ $
Diluted $ $ (0.01 ) $ $
 
Net income per share:
Basic $ 0.24 $ 0.14 $ 0.32 $ 0.46
Diluted $ 0.24 $ 0.14 $ 0.32 $ 0.46
 
Number of shares used in per share calculations:
Basic 86,855 92,386 87,810 94,518
Diluted 87,186 92,570 88,209 94,963
 
 
               

QLOGIC CORPORATION

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS TO

NON-GAAP INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

(unaudited — in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

 
GAAP income from continuing operations $ 20,586 $ 13,705 $ 28,513 $ 43,926
Items excluded from GAAP income from continuing operations:
Stock-based compensation 5,058 6,973 18,047 23,295
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets 243 243 730 730
Special charges 1,947 18,329
Income tax effect   (2,237 )   (2,576 )   (3,564 )   (7,444 )
Total non-GAAP adjustments   5,011     4,640     33,542     16,581  
Non-GAAP income from continuing operations $ 25,597   $ 18,345   $ 62,055   $ 60,507  
 
Income from continuing operations per diluted share:
GAAP income from continuing operations $ 0.24 $ 0.15 $ 0.32 $ 0.46
Adjustments   0.05     0.05     0.38     0.18  
Non-GAAP income from continuing operations $ 0.29   $ 0.20   $ 0.70   $ 0.64  
 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The non-GAAP financial measures contained herein are a supplement to the corresponding financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The non-GAAP financial measures presented exclude the items summarized in the above table. Management believes that adjustments for these items assist investors in making comparisons of period-to-period operating results and that these items are not indicative of the company’s on-going core operating performance.

The company has presented non-GAAP income from continuing operations and non-GAAP income from continuing operations per diluted share, on a basis consistent with its historical presentation, to assist investors in understanding the company’s core income from continuing operations and core income from continuing operations per diluted share on an on-going basis. These non-GAAP financial measures may also assist investors in making comparisons of the company’s core profitability with historical periods and comparisons of the company’s core profitability with the corresponding results for competitors. Management believes that non-GAAP income from continuing operations and non-GAAP income from continuing operations per diluted share are important measures in the evaluation of the company’s profitability. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude the adjustments described in the above table, and thus provide an overall measure of the company’s on-going profitability and related profitability on a per diluted share basis.

Management uses non-GAAP income from continuing operations and non-GAAP income from continuing operations per diluted share in its evaluation of the company’s core after-tax results of operations and trends between fiscal periods and believes that these measures are important components of its internal performance measurement process. In addition, the company prepares and maintains its budgets and forecasts for future periods on a basis consistent with these non-GAAP financial measures. Management believes that providing these non-GAAP financial measures allows investors to view the company’s financial results in the way that management views the financial results.

The non-GAAP financial measures presented herein have certain limitations in that they do not reflect all of the costs associated with the operations of the company’s business as determined in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, investors should consider non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or as superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures presented by the company may be different from the non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

For additional information on the items excluded from the non-GAAP financial measures and why the company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information to investors, the company refers you to the Form 8-K regarding this release filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

A summary of the non-GAAP adjustments presented in the table above by the financial statement line impacted is as follows:

               
(unaudited – in thousands) Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

December 29,

2013

     

December 30,

2012

Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Cost of revenues:
Stock-based compensation $ 259 $ 529 $ 1,082 $ 1,839
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets   243     243     730     730  
Total cost of revenue adjustments   502     772     1,812     2,569  
 
Operating expenses:
Engineering and development:
Stock-based compensation 2,462 3,030 9,070 10,444
Sales and marketing:
Stock-based compensation 1,251 1,619 4,274 5,217
General and administrative:
Stock-based compensation 1,086 1,795 3,621 5,795
Special charges   1,947         18,329      
Total operating expense adjustments   6,746     6,444     35,294     21,456  
 
Total non-GAAP adjustments before income taxes 7,248 7,216 37,106 24,025
Income tax effect   (2,237 )   (2,576 )   (3,564 )   (7,444 )
Total non-GAAP adjustments $ 5,011   $ 4,640   $ 33,542   $ 16,581  
 
 
                         

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited — in thousands)

 
December 29,

2013

March 31,

2013

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 108,998 $ 95,532
Marketable securities 353,433 359,974
Total cash and marketable securities 462,431 455,506
Accounts receivable, net 71,153 66,135
Inventories 14,044 20,160
Deferred tax assets 14,978 13,036
Other current assets 20,513 24,381
Total current assets 583,119 579,218
 
Property and equipment, net 87,609 96,336
Goodwill 110,976 110,976
Purchased intangible assets, net 3,386 4,054
Deferred tax assets 34,652 31,992
Other assets 2,376 2,587
 
$ 822,118 $ 825,163
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 23,837 $ 29,668
Accrued compensation 24,734 27,453
Accrued taxes 1,913 4,559
Deferred revenue 4,060 4,676
Other current liabilities 8,192 7,651
Total current liabilities 62,736 74,007
 
Accrued taxes 17,804 10,772
Other liabilities 7,824 6,107

Total liabilities

88,364 90,886
 
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock 214 212
Additional paid-in capital 951,743 932,557
Retained earnings 1,718,850 1,690,337
Accumulated other comprehensive income 249 1,887
Treasury stock (1,937,302) (1,890,716)
Total stockholders’ equity 733,754 734,277
 
$ 822,118 $ 825,163
 
 
     

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited — in thousands)

 
Nine Months Ended

 

December 29,

2013

                    December 30,

2012

 
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 28,513 $ 43,501
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 23,620 21,071
Stock-based compensation 18,047 23,295
Deferred income taxes (5,355) (3,810)
Other non-cash items 5,706 3,138
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (5,088) 7,179
Inventories 6,116 (3,311)
Other assets 537 113
Accounts payable (1,919) (2,499)
Accrued compensation (2,719) (2,385)
Accrued taxes, net 7,734 14,367
Other liabilities 2,841 870
Net cash provided by operating activities 78,033 101,529
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities (259,008) (228,202)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities 261,253 204,325
Purchases of property and equipment (21,043) (31,728)
Net cash used in investing activities (18,798) (55,605)
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock-based awards 6,756 6,571
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards 46 129
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units (4,584) (5,555)
Purchases of treasury stock (47,785) (111,729)
Payments for credit facility commitment fee (202)
Net cash used in financing activities (45,769) (110,584)
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 13,466 (64,660)
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 95,532 164,516
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 108,998 $ 99,856
 
 

QLOGIC CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(unaudited — in thousands)

Net Revenues

A summary of the company’s revenue components is as follows:

               
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

December 29,

2013

      December 30,

2012

Advanced Connectivity Platforms $ 98,452 $ 96,991 $ 285,653 $ 302,450
Legacy Connectivity Products   20,997   22,395   59,534   65,174
$ 119,449 $ 119,386 $ 345,187 $ 367,624
 

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...

ARMONK, N.Y., Nov. 20, 2014 /PRNewswire/ --  IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced that it is bringing a greater level of control, security and flexibility to cloud-based application development and delivery with a single-tenant version of Bluemix, IBM's platform-as-a-service. The new platform enables developers to build ap...

An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...